If the Race to the Top is to have an influence on making sure schools get better, someone has got to figure out how districts can be held accountable directly for their behavior when it comes to reform. Nowhere is this more clear than in South Carolina’s Richland School District - an area where the school board seems to relish opportunities to strike down innovative and independent charter schools.

The Hope Charter Academy saw its charter unanimously rejected by a hostile school board that uses any excuses it can to reject quality school applications.

Founded by a group of long time African-American activists and developed over an 18-month period, the Hope Academy proposal was initially given a temporary green light and thus signed up more than 250 interested parents. However, a hostile school board rejected its pleas despite four hours of convincing public testimony.

While some feel criticism of Race to the Top fever is premature, we use this example (only one of scores across the country) to illustrate why public policy at the federal level takes not just time, but real understanding and action of state influencers, to have any effect. South Carolina districts are the only authorizers that can (if they want to) fully fund charters. The one real alternative created - with support from the local charter association - only provides $3,400 - the state per pupil amount - for each student that enrolls in state charter district authorized schools.

Perhaps racing to the top is, in theory, a good idea. It won’t work, however, unless it transcends state and local politics and business as usual.

Interesting that Hope Academy is pretty darn near the school district the President cited in his (almost) State of the Union address as the reason we need to change…

Both the North Carolina Education Association and Paul Krohne, executive director of the South Carolina School Boards Association, have taken an opportunity over the past few weeks to look at ballot results in the Tar Heel and Palmetto States through rose-colored glasses.

In a day-after-the-election press release, the NCAE sang the praises of their membership for their mobilization in support of their “pro-education” (read: pro-union) slate, which included staunchly non-reform candidates Bev Purdue and Kay Hagan.

Krohne’s column of 11/19 in the Greenville News doled out accolades to South Carolina voters for coming down on the side of public education with their passing of 6 referendums totaling $933 million.

Voters in both Carolinas certainly did vote in favor of certain aspects of public education: more funding, more union control and more bureaucracy for starters.

More “Dollars and Sense”